1 |
Stroller wrote: |
2 |
> Hi there, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I'm in the process of commissioning a box which has a large hard drive |
5 |
> on which videos, mp3s & stuff will be stored. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> On all my other machines, such drives are mounted at /mnt/space (and a |
8 |
> second drive at /mnt/morespace) |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I have a notion to move to a hierarchy under /media/ - something like |
11 |
> /media/space or /media/videos or /media/disk1, /media/disk2, |
12 |
> /media/disk3, ... |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I can't remember WHY I came iup with this idea, however. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Googling, I can find more than one message to this list in which I |
17 |
> assert this intention and state refer to a discussion on this list |
18 |
> which led to it. However I can't find that previous discussion itself. |
19 |
> http://www.linux-archive.org/gentoo-user/168375-mediatomb-media-server-users-permissions-media-videox.html |
20 |
> |
21 |
> http://www.nabble.com/Autofs-or-ivman--td14647701.html |
22 |
> |
23 |
> The only thing that springs to mind is that /mnt was originally used |
24 |
> by system administrators to temporarily mount removable media. I think |
25 |
> the FHS comes into it. But right now this isn't terribly convincing, |
26 |
> particularly as I currently expect to be using one BIG volume, so |
27 |
> there should be no need for more than drive mounted in this way. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Can anyone persuade me or provide other reasons for using /media? |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Thanks in advance, |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Stroller. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> |
36 |
> |
37 |
|
38 |
You can create a mount point and mount the drive where ever you want. I |
39 |
created the mount point /data on my system and mounted a drive to it. I |
40 |
store my wallpapers, some rarely used documents, owners manuals and |
41 |
things like that there. Point is, Linux doesn't care where you put it, |
42 |
just put it where you want it and can find it. |
43 |
|
44 |
Dale |
45 |
|
46 |
:-) :-) |