1 |
Hi there, |
2 |
|
3 |
I'm in the process of commissioning a box which has a large hard drive |
4 |
on which videos, mp3s & stuff will be stored. |
5 |
|
6 |
On all my other machines, such drives are mounted at /mnt/space (and a |
7 |
second drive at /mnt/morespace) |
8 |
|
9 |
I have a notion to move to a hierarchy under /media/ - something like / |
10 |
media/space or /media/videos or /media/disk1, /media/disk2, /media/ |
11 |
disk3, ... |
12 |
|
13 |
I can't remember WHY I came iup with this idea, however. |
14 |
|
15 |
Googling, I can find more than one message to this list in which I |
16 |
assert this intention and state refer to a discussion on this list |
17 |
which led to it. However I can't find that previous discussion itself. |
18 |
http://www.linux-archive.org/gentoo-user/168375-mediatomb-media-server-users-permissions-media-videox.html |
19 |
http://www.nabble.com/Autofs-or-ivman--td14647701.html |
20 |
|
21 |
The only thing that springs to mind is that /mnt was originally used |
22 |
by system administrators to temporarily mount removable media. I think |
23 |
the FHS comes into it. But right now this isn't terribly convincing, |
24 |
particularly as I currently expect to be using one BIG volume, so |
25 |
there should be no need for more than drive mounted in this way. |
26 |
|
27 |
Can anyone persuade me or provide other reasons for using /media? |
28 |
|
29 |
Thanks in advance, |
30 |
|
31 |
Stroller. |