| 1 |
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 17:26:18 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I don't want it. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I know. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> I like Gentoo in -dev |
| 8 |
> I will not allow Gentoo anywhere near -prod |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> This is a very considered decision, as a result of already having to |
| 11 |
> fix (many times) the monumental fuck ups that happen when it is done in |
| 12 |
> an environment such as this. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Why should I do all the work of pinning packages to known good versions |
| 15 |
> when the RHEL devs have already done all the heavy lifting for me? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
You shouldn't, that's why I made the point about there not being a |
| 18 |
stable, frozen version of the portage tree. If that existed, pinning at a |
| 19 |
stable setup would be doable, otherwise it would be a nightmare. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Vital papers will demonstrate their vitality by moving to where you |
| 26 |
can't find them. |
Archives