1 |
Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Along comes the DVD+R format. The DVD+R format has some variances in |
4 |
> *how* data is represented on disc, but to the player that doesn't know |
5 |
> any better, it looks just like any other DVD. The big difference DVD+R |
6 |
> brought was that the 'book type' field was burnable on any drive which |
7 |
> was capable of burning DVD+R media, and a disc appropriately burned |
8 |
> would play in any home DVD player as though it were a pressed disc. |
9 |
> (Yay, we can has home-recorded movies again!) |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Both DVD+R and DVD-R discs are sold, but I only ever buy DVD+R discs; |
12 |
> as far as I can tell, playback works in everything, and just about any |
13 |
> recorder will record to them. I have to think that the DVD-R discs are |
14 |
> sold only because there are still some ancient burners out there. |
15 |
|
16 |
Not true: DVD- allows to write this too, but the media you can buy has been |
17 |
prerecorded to satisfy the film industry. |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
> When in doubt, go with DVD+R. |
22 |
|
23 |
This is a wrong advise: When In doubt go DVD- as this is the official format. |
24 |
There is one single exception: For Dual layer, the DVD+R/DL media gives better |
25 |
results. |
26 |
Jörg |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
EMail:joerg@××××××××××××××××××××××××.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin |
30 |
js@××××××××××××.de (uni) |
31 |
joerg.schilling@××××××××××××××××.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ |
32 |
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily |