1 |
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Joerg Schilling |
2 |
<Joerg.Schilling@××××××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
3 |
> Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Along comes the DVD+R format. The DVD+R format has some variances in |
6 |
>> *how* data is represented on disc, but to the player that doesn't know |
7 |
>> any better, it looks just like any other DVD. The big difference DVD+R |
8 |
>> brought was that the 'book type' field was burnable on any drive which |
9 |
>> was capable of burning DVD+R media, and a disc appropriately burned |
10 |
>> would play in any home DVD player as though it were a pressed disc. |
11 |
>> (Yay, we can has home-recorded movies again!) |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> Both DVD+R and DVD-R discs are sold, but I only ever buy DVD+R discs; |
14 |
>> as far as I can tell, playback works in everything, and just about any |
15 |
>> recorder will record to them. I have to think that the DVD-R discs are |
16 |
>> sold only because there are still some ancient burners out there. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Not true: DVD- allows to write this too, but the media you can buy has been |
19 |
> prerecorded to satisfy the film industry. |
20 |
|
21 |
I alluded to this in my description of DVD-R. Thank you for correcting |
22 |
my description of implementation details, though. (Obviously, you |
23 |
don't need a special burner, but you do need to buy specially-licensed |
24 |
media.) |
25 |
|
26 |
>> When in doubt, go with DVD+R. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> This is a wrong advise: When In doubt go DVD- as this is the official format. |
29 |
|
30 |
I don't understand this position at all for this context. Unless |
31 |
you're doing work in particular fields for the recording industry, why |
32 |
touch DVD-R at all? Doing so because "it's the official format" |
33 |
doesn't really mean anything; the industry and market has been stable |
34 |
for years, and upstream isn't going to switch out everything out from |
35 |
under people using the format. (At least, not in a way that doesn't |
36 |
screw over DVD-R users as well.) |
37 |
|
38 |
I'm not saying you're necessarily wrong in that perhaps DVD-R might be |
39 |
the more appropriate format, but you should give some better arguments |
40 |
than "it's the official format". |
41 |
|
42 |
> There is one single exception: For Dual layer, the DVD+R/DL media gives better |
43 |
> results. |
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
:wq |