Archives
Archives
| From: | Andrew Hoffman <andy.hoffman12@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] How reliable is ext3? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:22:57 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAKqv15Q51_1GY7GUExXx6PwX-O1F7uecu6MwYTE7Zamdw7TFYA@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] How reliable is ext3? by Jarry |
||
| 1 | On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Jarry <mr.jarry@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > On 23-Apr-13 22:40, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > ext4 is fine. All the horror stories ended years ago and almost all |
| 6 | >> major distros ship it as a default. |
| 7 | >> |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > Hm, I remember one horror story about "ext4 data corruption bug" |
| 10 | > which circulated in public just a few months ago: |
| 11 | > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/**23/690<https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/23/690> |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | > Jarry |
| 14 | > |
| 15 | > Does anyone know if this ever was a production issue? |
| 16 | Gentoo-sources is 6 versions behind |
| 17 | http://packages.gentoo.org/package/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources for the stable |
| 18 | kernel |
| 19 | latest dev is 3.6.9-rc8 |