| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Jorge Almeida wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Holly Bostick wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>>Afaik, they are set by /etc/make/profile/make.defaults, and |
| 8 |
>>overridden/added to |
| 9 |
>>globally by /etc/make.conf, and individually by /etc/portage/package.use. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> The handbook |
| 13 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=2&chap=2 |
| 14 |
> says they come from base, default-linux, default-linux/x86 and |
| 15 |
> default-linux/x86/2004.3 (as an example). default-linux is empty (which |
| 16 |
> is not confusing, as it may not be empty in the future) but USE settings |
| 17 |
> in default-linux/x86 are identical with |
| 18 |
> /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.1/ (meaning the file |
| 19 |
> make.defaults in both directories). But are they identical _always_? The |
| 20 |
> latter directory is the target of the symlink |
| 21 |
> /etc/make/profile, but what about the former? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
They are cascading. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
AFAIK, if your symlink points to default-linux/x86/2005.1, you'll also pull in |
| 26 |
everything in default-linux/x86 and default-linux. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
So why are they identical ... ? Good question. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
- -- |
| 31 |
[Name ] :: [Matan I. Peled ] |
| 32 |
[Location ] :: [Israel ] |
| 33 |
[Public Key] :: [0xD6F42CA5 ] |
| 34 |
[Keyserver ] :: [keyserver.kjsl.com] |
| 35 |
encrypted/signed plain text preferred |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 38 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
iD8DBQFDTsG1A7Qvptb0LKURAkq7AJ9wKXd2eZPqL/kN1DTeTOM7nOB1AQCdEOSm |
| 41 |
EuLoyLWhoQP8+2YAxCC3xQs= |
| 42 |
=G51S |
| 43 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives