Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [Offtopic] Lightweight server distro for an old motherboard
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:38:11
Message-Id: CA+czFiCoJpHigr18wFpC7ovggDtM=Y9yBUnxaroUhjtH=9cbuw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] [Offtopic] Lightweight server distro for an old motherboard by Andrew Lowe
1 On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Andrew Lowe <agl@×××××××.au> wrote:
2 > Hi all,
3 > Anyone got any suggestions for a lightweight server distro for an
4 > old motherboard? I've got one of the VIA mini-ITX boards, SP13000, and want
5 > to whack something light onto it. It will be working as a file/media server
6 > and will be headless, hence will be fiddled via ssh. Obviously there are the
7 > usual suspects, debian, centos, but does anyone have any recommendations viv
8 > a vis a stripped down distro, sort of like Lubuntu is to Ubuntu?
9 >
10 > Any thoughts greatly appreciated,
11
12 Cripes, you're asking in gentoo-user. Of course someone's going to
13 suggest Gentoo.
14
15 Let it be me...and I'll explain:
16
17 1) You can put something like -Os or -O2 in your CFLAGS, whichever
18 helps your performance case better.
19 2) You can target your CFLAGS to your exact processor, allowing
20 generated machine code to be as efficient as possible on your CPU
21 (which you'll need, if it's a low-power CPU!)
22 3) You don't have to compile on the mini-ITX board; you can
23 cross-compile and use binpkgs to install.
24 4) You can use USE flags to strip out (virtually) any and every
25 feature you don't use, reducing both your code size, load and
26 execution time.
27
28 If you want to do something lightweight, there's not much better you
29 can do than with Gentoo.
30
31 --
32 :wq

Replies