1 |
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:13:32 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> > What printer do you have. I use foo2zjs with a LaserJet 1022 and |
5 |
>> > thought it was the only way, not that it causes me any problems. |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> I have the LaserJer 1020, foo2zjs used to be the only way to print for |
8 |
>> me, too; by chance, I was looking at HPLIP the other day and saw 1020 |
9 |
>> was now in the supported printers list (it wasn't when I bought the |
10 |
>> printer). Looks like 1022 is there, too. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> That's worth looking at, AFAICT the 1020 and 1022 are basically the same. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Do you have any particular objection to foo2zjs or is it just an OCD |
15 |
> attitude to not having unnecessary packages installed? |
16 |
|
17 |
It never worked easily for me, I always had to spend 45 minutes |
18 |
screwing around with the printer to get anything to come out. |
19 |
Conflicts with usblp module. Also, the installation process left some |
20 |
things to be desired (e.g. foo2zjs webpage explicitly states not to |
21 |
use distributions packages and to install it manually instead). |
22 |
Basically it was always a hassle for me. |
23 |
|
24 |
HPLIP is an official (and supported?) driver and seems to have all the |
25 |
features that the Windows printer drivers have, which foo2zjs didn't |
26 |
necessarily do (or do as easily). More importantly, it worked right |
27 |
the first time I tried it. :) |