| 1 |
On Mon, Feb 19 2018, John Blinka wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:40 AM allan gottlieb <gottlieb@×××.edu> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> On Sun, Feb 18 2018, Mick wrote: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> > On Sunday, 18 February 2018 01:09:36 GMT allan gottlieb wrote: |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> Specifically excluding the buggy (old) version of webkit-gtk, |
| 10 |
>> portage wants me to merge a newish (testing) version of gnucash that |
| 11 |
>> uses a solid new version of webkit-gtk. I have the new version of |
| 12 |
>> webkit-gtk, but really want to delay installing the testing gnucash. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Looks like gnucash-2.7.4-r1 is now in the stable branch of portage despite |
| 16 |
> gnucash declaring “This release is UNSTABLE and SHOULD NOT BE USED in |
| 17 |
> production” (their caps, not mine). I’ve masked it and reverted to |
| 18 |
> icu58.2-r1 by masking icu-60.2. The older icu allows |
| 19 |
> webkit-gtk-2.4.11-r200 to build, and gives me a version of gnucash which |
| 20 |
> I’ve used for a long time and trust. Not going to upgrade irreversibly to |
| 21 |
> a version which the authors themselves don’t trust. My 2 cents. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> John |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Thanks for the heads up. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I synced this morning and ~2.7.4 was highest number so the stable -r1 |
| 28 |
must have been today. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I am (I believe like you) running gnucash-2.6.15. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
I also am running webkit-gtk 2.4.11-r200. The failure to build is |
| 33 |
a reinstall |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
[ebuild rR ] net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.4.11-r200 |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
presumably due to the upgrade of icu. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
I will be on the lookout for the listed-as-stable-declared-unstable |
| 40 |
gnucash-2.7. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Thanks again for the heads up. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
allan gottlieb |
Archives