1 |
Need link |
2 |
|
3 |
Dave |
4 |
|
5 |
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022, 1:52 AM Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
|
7 |
> Wols Lists wrote: |
8 |
> > On 18/12/2022 22:11, Dale wrote: |
9 |
> >> Wol wrote: |
10 |
> >>> On 18/12/2022 18:59, Dale wrote: |
11 |
> >>>> Since this is local, I just use rsync to do my backups. I did have to |
12 |
> >>>> change the options a bit. It seems TrueNAS doesn't like some of the |
13 |
> >>>> permissions or something. |
14 |
> >>> |
15 |
> >>> Are you running the rsync daemon on the NAS? I'm probably teaching |
16 |
> >>> grandma to suck eggs, but that massively reduces the need for network |
17 |
> >>> traffic. |
18 |
> >>> |
19 |
> >>> Cheers, |
20 |
> >>> Wol |
21 |
> >>> |
22 |
> >>> |
23 |
> >> |
24 |
> >> |
25 |
> >> I mount the NAS on my Gentoo rig. I mount it under /mnt. Then I run |
26 |
> >> rsync and copy from the source to the mount point for the NAS. I may |
27 |
> >> could go the other way but never thought about doing it that way. Kinda |
28 |
> >> sounds backwards to me but I dunno. ;-) |
29 |
> >> |
30 |
> > Sounds to me like you're doing it all wrong either way ... |
31 |
> > |
32 |
> > What is *supposed* to happen is that you have the daemon running on |
33 |
> > one machine and the client on the other - doesn't matter which. |
34 |
> > |
35 |
> > Then the client tells the daemon what files are to be copied, THE TWO |
36 |
> > COMPARE CHECKSUMS, and only the stuff that fails the checksum is |
37 |
> > copied. So if you're doing an incremental backup, network usage and |
38 |
> > writes are kept to a minimum. |
39 |
> > |
40 |
> > I tell people to an in-place backup if they're running on a snapshot |
41 |
> > setup, because again it only writes stuff that has actually changed. |
42 |
> > |
43 |
> > Cheers, |
44 |
> > Wol |
45 |
> > |
46 |
> > |
47 |
> |
48 |
> |
49 |
> Do you have a link to the proper way to do it? I don't copy to a |
50 |
> different machine often so my current method may be the problem. Maybe |
51 |
> the way you mention will work much better, even a little better would be |
52 |
> nice. ;-) |
53 |
> |
54 |
> Dale |
55 |
> |
56 |
> :-) :-) |
57 |
> |
58 |
> |