Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: David Rosenbaum <rosenbaumd181@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] NAS and replacing with larger drives
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 08:01:58
Message-Id: CAL+8heOfDPcfqKPcOOntJSm08Z2-Za=SdvMZTdSmtqQ-5-GVSw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] NAS and replacing with larger drives by Dale
1 Need link
2
3 Dave
4
5 On Tue, Dec 20, 2022, 1:52 AM Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
6
7 > Wols Lists wrote:
8 > > On 18/12/2022 22:11, Dale wrote:
9 > >> Wol wrote:
10 > >>> On 18/12/2022 18:59, Dale wrote:
11 > >>>> Since this is local, I just use rsync to do my backups. I did have to
12 > >>>> change the options a bit. It seems TrueNAS doesn't like some of the
13 > >>>> permissions or something.
14 > >>>
15 > >>> Are you running the rsync daemon on the NAS? I'm probably teaching
16 > >>> grandma to suck eggs, but that massively reduces the need for network
17 > >>> traffic.
18 > >>>
19 > >>> Cheers,
20 > >>> Wol
21 > >>>
22 > >>>
23 > >>
24 > >>
25 > >> I mount the NAS on my Gentoo rig. I mount it under /mnt. Then I run
26 > >> rsync and copy from the source to the mount point for the NAS. I may
27 > >> could go the other way but never thought about doing it that way. Kinda
28 > >> sounds backwards to me but I dunno. ;-)
29 > >>
30 > > Sounds to me like you're doing it all wrong either way ...
31 > >
32 > > What is *supposed* to happen is that you have the daemon running on
33 > > one machine and the client on the other - doesn't matter which.
34 > >
35 > > Then the client tells the daemon what files are to be copied, THE TWO
36 > > COMPARE CHECKSUMS, and only the stuff that fails the checksum is
37 > > copied. So if you're doing an incremental backup, network usage and
38 > > writes are kept to a minimum.
39 > >
40 > > I tell people to an in-place backup if they're running on a snapshot
41 > > setup, because again it only writes stuff that has actually changed.
42 > >
43 > > Cheers,
44 > > Wol
45 > >
46 > >
47 >
48 >
49 > Do you have a link to the proper way to do it? I don't copy to a
50 > different machine often so my current method may be the problem. Maybe
51 > the way you mention will work much better, even a little better would be
52 > nice. ;-)
53 >
54 > Dale
55 >
56 > :-) :-)
57 >
58 >