| 1 |
On 14 October 2010 00:38, Dean Matzkov <bapabooiee@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Well, if you were running portage-2-2_rc67, that's already pretty much |
| 3 |
> bleeding edge =P |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Yeah, I was wondering if someone would notice that. :-) |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> But just out of curiosity, though, is there any particular reason |
| 8 |
> you're not running a more-stable version of Portage, such as v2.1.8.3 |
| 9 |
> or v2.1.9.17? The 2.2 release-candidates are hard-masked for a reason |
| 10 |
> - which includes things randomly breaking, such as this unmerge issue |
| 11 |
> you experienced. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I don't remember exactly but there was a feature I wanted that wasn't |
| 14 |
in Portage 2.1. I think it was Sets. I believe I needed it (or thought |
| 15 |
I needed it) to simplify installing KDE. |
Archives