1 |
Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> Apparently, though unproven, at 08:52 on Thursday 09 June 2011, Dale did opine |
3 |
> thusly: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
>> Paul Hartman wrote: |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Dale<rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>>> I'm just hoping html5 will improve some things. May not but doesn't |
11 |
>>>> hurt to hope. I just hope it will eliminate some of the things that |
12 |
>>>> are such power or memory hogs now. It may not at first but eventually |
13 |
>>>> |
14 |
>>> Some stuff is already looking good, outside of streaming video, like |
15 |
>>> http://chrome.angrybirds.com/ which probably would not be possible |
16 |
>>> without Flash or Java just a couple years ago. |
17 |
>>> |
18 |
>> So things like youtube won't change any? |
19 |
>> |
20 |
> Why do you think it will change at all? |
21 |
> |
22 |
> IPv4 is not going away. There is still lots of space available and it has a |
23 |
> very long life ahead of it still. |
24 |
> |
25 |
|
26 |
I was just hoping thing like youtube might change for the better. What |
27 |
little I know about html5, it sounds like it is going to be better. If |
28 |
something as big as youtube changes to better its site then others will |
29 |
too. |
30 |
|
31 |
We sort of switched subject from IPv6 to HTML5. I'm sure IPv4 will be |
32 |
around a long time tho. |
33 |
|
34 |
Now back to finding the leak in my car A/C. It won't hold a vacuum at |
35 |
the moment. Weird. |
36 |
|
37 |
Dale |
38 |
|
39 |
:-) :-) |