| 1 |
Stroller schrieb am 08.11.2008 19:06: |
| 2 |
> I assume you're aware that if you look inside that directory you'll find |
| 3 |
> "desktop" and "server" subdirectories? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Yes I am, but what is the problem with that? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> $ ls /usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0/ |
| 8 |
> desktop developer parent server |
| 9 |
> $ ls -l /etc/make.profile |
| 10 |
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 Oct 8 07:01 /etc/make.profile -> |
| 11 |
> /usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0 |
| 12 |
> $ ls /etc/make.profile |
| 13 |
> desktop developer parent server |
| 14 |
> $ |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> In this case I had assumed the "default" was for Portage simply to |
| 17 |
> assume desktop. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
No, if you want the desktop profile you have to specify this explicitly |
| 20 |
by using /usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0/desktop for |
| 21 |
example as symlink. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Only relevant are the files in the directory of the chosen profile and |
| 24 |
not the subdirectories. The "parent" file points to the relevant files |
| 25 |
that create the profile. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
cat ${PORTDIR}/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0/parent |
| 28 |
.. |
| 29 |
../../../../releases/2008.0 |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
cat ${PORTDIR}/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0/desktop/parent |
| 32 |
.. |
| 33 |
../../../../../targets/desktop |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
cat ${PORTDIR}/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0/server/parent |
| 36 |
.. |
| 37 |
../../../../../targets/server |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
As you can see profiles go always up in the directory structure and not |
| 40 |
down. So if you choose 2008.0. Server, developer and desktop profiles |
| 41 |
are omitted. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Regards, |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
Daniel |
Archives