| 1 |
On 8 Nov 2008, at 17:35, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Stroller schrieb am 08.11.2008 18:13: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> I wouldn't be inclined to assume a new user might be using a server |
| 6 |
>> profile because last time I checked these spit out an ugly warning |
| 7 |
>> message about "this profile being untested" for EVERY SINGLE package |
| 8 |
>> emerged. |
| 9 |
>> ... |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I don't know if the server profile is untested. I for myself neither |
| 12 |
> use |
| 13 |
> a server nor a desktop profile. Here is my profile symlink. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> /etc/make.profile -> |
| 16 |
> /media/system/repositories/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0 |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I assume you're aware that if you look inside that directory you'll |
| 20 |
find "desktop" and "server" subdirectories? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
$ ls /usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0/ |
| 23 |
desktop developer parent server |
| 24 |
$ ls -l /etc/make.profile |
| 25 |
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 Oct 8 07:01 /etc/make.profile -> /usr/ |
| 26 |
portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0 |
| 27 |
$ ls /etc/make.profile |
| 28 |
desktop developer parent server |
| 29 |
$ |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
In this case I had assumed the "default" was for Portage simply to |
| 32 |
assume desktop. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Stroller. |
Archives