Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Anything better than procmail? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:10:32 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20100614140909.3d0dddd9@digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Anything better than procmail? by Tanstaafl |
||
| 1 | On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:15:43 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > That said... does anyone know of a repo that provides good quality up to |
| 4 | > date builds of dovecot - maybe even including the 2.0 betas? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | How about the portage tree, which goes up to 2.0 bets 5? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | Neil Bothwick |
| 11 | |
| 12 | To most people solutions mean finding the answers. But to chemists |
| 13 | solutions are things that are still all mixed up. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Anything better than procmail? | Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> |