| 1 |
On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 18:26:47 +0700, Ста Деюс wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > > How do you know that the contents of the script are not relevant |
| 4 |
> > > when you |
| 5 |
> > don't know what the problem is? It is also useful to know the exact |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Mathematics (mother of computers) answers: 1+1=2. -- Meaning: same |
| 8 |
> script w/ the same bash gets same execution. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Except it's not the same bash, you stated that they are different |
| 11 |
versions. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> > version of bash in use on each system. There are subtle differences, |
| 14 |
> > and bugs, between bash versions. Your script may be tripping up on |
| 15 |
> > one of these. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Alright. Here is an example of the problematic line from the point |
| 18 |
> of view of "Gentoo's" bash: |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
This is what was asked for from the start, and as soon as you provided |
| 21 |
it, several people identified a potential problem. It's no use saying |
| 22 |
"this doesn't work" if you don't specify "this". |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Walking on water and writing software to specification is easy if they're |
| 29 |
frozen. |
Archives