Archives
Archives
| From: | Antoine <melser.anton@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge java syntax | ||
| Date: | Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:11:00 | ||
| Message-Id: | 92d3a4950603221203p399684bah@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: emerge java syntax by hawat.thufir@gmail.com | ||
| 1 | On 22/03/06, hawat.thufir@×××××.com <hawat.thufir@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > So, masked packages only require that package.keyword be edited, but |
| 3 | > hardmasked packages also require that package.unmask be edited? |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > I see the sense in having different grades of unmasking, but not the need |
| 6 | > for two distinct files(?). |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | |
| 9 | One file with syntax or two files without... |
| 10 | Cheers |
| 11 | Antoine |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | This is where I should put some witty comment. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge java syntax | THUFIR HAWAT <hawat.thufir@×××××.com> |