| 1 |
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 09:24:54AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> I want to explain about the recent openrc's going directly to stable. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> The team had been testing from the previous stable, 0.9.x series all the |
| 5 |
> way through 0.10.x. We found out recently that releng needed the new |
| 6 |
> openrc stable because of the cds/isos being broken. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> There hadn't been bugs reported, so we started attempting to stabilize |
| 9 |
> 0.11.5 so that we could have a stable newer OpenRC for releng. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> When we started stabling, more regressions came up, so we had to fix |
| 12 |
> those. That is why you are seeing several versions go to stable |
| 13 |
> directly on some arch's arch's. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> wrt 0.11.7, a couple of developers looked over the patches with me and |
| 16 |
> we did not see issues. 0.11.8 will be the very last one of these to go |
| 17 |
> stable. Please bear with me on this. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Ok, this is the last update. 0.11.8 fixes the issue in 0.11.7, so you |
| 20 |
should not see any more quick pushes to stable. I take full |
| 21 |
responsibility for the issue in 0.11.7, and will work with the OpenRC |
| 22 |
team and QA to catch issues like this better in the future. Thanks for |
| 23 |
your patience. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
William |
Archives