Archives
Archives
| From: | Iain Buchanan <iaindb@××××××××××××.au> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Now Know Why Portage Is So Slow | ||
| Date: | Sat, 27 May 2006 11:56:08 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1148730136.4885.5.camel@orpheus | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Now Know Why Portage Is So Slow by Neil Bothwick |
||
| 1 | On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 08:25 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Also, unless this have changed dramatically, eix's database update is |
| 4 | > *much* faster than that of esearch - seconds vs. minutes. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | I've heard that argument before, and I don't know why some people see |
| 7 | that behaviour - esearch only takes seconds for me... |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au> |
| 10 | |
| 11 | You should avoid hedging, at least that's what I think. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Now Know Why Portage Is So Slow | Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Now Know Why Portage Is So Slow | "Bo Ørsted Andresen" <bo.andresen@××××.dk> |