1 |
Mark David Dumlao wrote: |
2 |
> But it is a problem that must be addressed. It doesn't help to boil |
3 |
> the situation into an inaccurate but amusing caricature of the |
4 |
> problem. That's how the many bad interfaces get developed. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> The problem is solved for my case. I'm not going to be using html |
7 |
> mails. But ignoring the problem isn't going to make it disappear for |
8 |
> everyone else - there isn't a way for a user to find out they're being |
9 |
> ignored. That's all that needs to be said. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> |
12 |
> |
13 |
|
14 |
This is my two cents. Since when someone comes here and posts a html |
15 |
message they get told not to use html anyway, why not let them know |
16 |
beforehand that html is not the "norm" on this list? I don't think it |
17 |
would hurt to put that on the website where the mailing lists subscribe |
18 |
info is and also in the email that confirms the subscription. I |
19 |
wouldn't mind seeing that part in bold or something in the email to make |
20 |
sure it is seen. I suspect this would solve a lot of problems in the |
21 |
long run. |
22 |
|
23 |
Another two cents before I run out of change. It may be a good idea to |
24 |
mention about top posting as well. Since people complain about it, may |
25 |
as well put that there as well. Maybe not in bold but in the same |
26 |
paragraph. Maybe put this in a netiquette section or something. Why |
27 |
does spell check not like the word netiquette? o_O |
28 |
|
29 |
Dale |
30 |
|
31 |
:-) :-) |