| 1 |
On 2010-11-18, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Apparently, though unproven, at 02:43 on Thursday 18 November 2010, Walter |
| 3 |
> Dnes did opine thusly: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 02:00:48AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> > If you then mentioned that their defaults broke Dale's setup, they'd |
| 8 |
>> > likely answer "Who's Dale?" followed shortly by "None of us have |
| 9 |
>> > hardware like Dale to test. Sorry 'bout that. Set USE=-hal" |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> Of course the USE flag advice is given *AFTER* the new flag breaks |
| 12 |
>> your system. That's why I use "-*" at the beginning of my USE in |
| 13 |
>> /etc/make.conf. I never found out whether hal would break my system<G>. |
| 14 |
>> If Dale had used "-*" his X would not have broken, even if some other |
| 15 |
>> ebuild pulled it onto the machine as a hard-coded dependancy. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Looks like the *actual* problem is non-application of OYFEAL[1],not what the |
| 18 |
> devs do. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Google doesn't seem to know what OYFEAL means. Do we get any hints? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Grant |
Archives