| 1 |
Am 26.05.2012 22:28, schrieb Dale: |
| 2 |
> Jarry wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 26-May-12 22:01, Dale wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Jarry wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> |
| 6 |
>>>> after updating baselayout from 2.0.3 to 2.1-r1 /run is mounted |
| 7 |
>>>> as tmpfs. But I can not find any mount-option for controlling |
| 8 |
>>>> how much memory is (or could be) used for it. |
| 9 |
>>>> |
| 10 |
>>>> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on |
| 11 |
>>>> tmpfs 8223848 224 8223624 1% /run |
| 12 |
>>>> |
| 13 |
>>>> I know it does not use 8GB right now, yet I'd like to reduce |
| 14 |
>>>> it to some lower value, not half of my physical memory. |
| 15 |
>>>> How can I do it? Can I simply add line in fstab like: |
| 16 |
>>>> |
| 17 |
>>>> none /run tmpfs size=128m 0 0 ??? |
| 18 |
>>>> |
| 19 |
>>>> Jarry |
| 20 |
>>> |
| 21 |
>>> Holy smoke ! Mine is doing the same thing. |
| 22 |
>>> tmpfs 7.9G 260K 7.9G 1% /run |
| 23 |
>>> |
| 24 |
>>> But I also have this: |
| 25 |
>>> tmpfs 7.9G 0 7.9G 0% /var/tmp/portage |
| 26 |
>>> |
| 27 |
>>> So, between those two, I could run out of ram since I have 16Gbs. |
| 28 |
>>> |
| 29 |
>>> There is now TWO people that needs a answer to this question. Why does |
| 30 |
>>> it need that much anyway? It looks to me like a few hundred Mbs, like |
| 31 |
>>> Jarry posted, would be plenty. Jeepers creepers. lol |
| 32 |
>>> |
| 33 |
>>> Dale |
| 34 |
>> |
| 35 |
>> I suppose default size for tmpfs is half of physical memory, |
| 36 |
>> if it is not configured somewhere else. |
| 37 |
>> |
| 38 |
>> BTW, is there any way to turn this great feature off? |
| 39 |
>> What is it good for? I do not see any advantage in having |
| 40 |
>> /run on tmpfs... |
| 41 |
>> |
| 42 |
>> Jarry |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> I had no idea it was doing this either until your post. I got the same |
| 46 |
> questions as you do. Why is it there? Why so much is allocated to it? |
| 47 |
> Where can we change the settings for this questionable "feature"? |
| 48 |
> |
| 49 |
> I'm hoping someone will come along and answer both our questions. I'm |
| 50 |
> really hoping for a place we can change the settings. I don't mind it |
| 51 |
> being there so much if it is useful. I would like to know its purpose |
| 52 |
> tho. |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
As Michael Mol already said, tmpfs for the run dir is not a bad thing, |
| 55 |
it, it does not eat all your ram :) |
| 56 |
I however have a different question: Why do we need a new /run when we |
| 57 |
already have /var/run. There's no mention of /run in the FHS either. |
| 58 |
I only see udev stuff under /run - So it's another crazy udev thing? :) |
Archives