1 |
Quoth the Neil Bothwick |
2 |
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 22:53:27 -0700, Darren Kirby wrote: |
3 |
> > > 0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different |
4 |
> > > version should be offered, when you "emerge dir2ogg"? |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > Well, I'm the upstream author, and _I_ think there should be different |
7 |
> > (ie: newer) version offered. Good enough? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Sort of. Their is a newer version available in portage, but the ebuild has |
10 |
> not been marked stable yet. however, the latest stable is 0.9.2 and I see |
11 |
> you released 0.9.3 in July, so the ebuilds are definitely lagging behind. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> When the package has not changed in terms of build process and |
14 |
> dependencies, you can normally make a copy of the ebuild with the new |
15 |
> version number, digest it and then emerge it. As the author and a Gentoo |
16 |
> user, why not make an ebuild available on your web page and post it too |
17 |
> Bugzilla, then the package maintainer may pick it up and put it in portage |
18 |
|
19 |
I did! Back on September 12th: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147360 |
20 |
|
21 |
I don't know if it is overworked devs, lost in the shuffle, or what, but I've |
22 |
done all I can. I am not going to harass the devs about it... |
23 |
|
24 |
-d |
25 |
-- |
26 |
darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org |
27 |
"...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..." |
28 |
- Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972 |
29 |
-- |
30 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |