Archives
Archives
| From: | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Going ~x86? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:02:23 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200911121201.19115.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Going ~x86? by Albert Hopkins |
||
| 1 | On Wednesday 11 November 2009 18:36:23 Albert Hopkins wrote: |
| 2 | > So my advice is: pick and branch and stick with your own kind. It's far |
| 3 | > fewer headaches in the long run. And "unstable" isn't really unstable, |
| 4 | > it's "untested". There's a difference. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Actually it's not "untested", it's "still being tested". There's a difference. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | :-) |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |