Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Marc Joliet <marcec@×××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage metadata cache backend: sqlite or not?
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 19:34:26
Message-Id: 20150504213353.411c112c@marcec.fritz.box
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage metadata cache backend: sqlite or not? by Nilesh Govindrajan
1 Oh wow, I completely forgot about this open thread. In my defense, I had to
2 move out two (or was it three?) days after I started the thread, and didn't have
3 internet again until over a month later.
4
5 Am Wed, 13 Aug 2014 07:30:01 +0530
6 schrieb Nilesh Govindrajan <me@××××××××.com>:
7
8 [...]
9 > Having tried this feature, I'd advise against it. It takes long time
10 > to generate metadata after sync and not really that advantageous. Also
11 > eix has it's own issues in this mode.
12
13 Do I understand correctly: you recommend switching away from the sqlite
14 backend? Also, can you please elaborate on the issues with eix? I haven't
15 noticed anything so far, but some bugs are easy to miss.
16
17 --
18 Marc Joliet
19 --
20 "People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we
21 don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup

Replies

Subject Author
[DONE] Re: [gentoo-user] Portage metadata cache backend: sqlite or not? Marc Joliet <marcec@×××.de>