1 |
On 02/08/13 07:42, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
2 |
> On 02/08/13 02:27, William Kenworthy wrote: |
3 |
>> On 02/08/13 00:28, Tanstaafl wrote: |
4 |
... |
5 |
> |
6 |
> so why follow with unreliable fork, when there is the official package |
7 |
> available with equal features? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> |
10 |
|
11 |
easy - it works and while I had machines running some of each it was |
12 |
only the udev machines that needed continual maintenance in that area. |
13 |
The latest and greatest isnt always the best. |
14 |
|
15 |
I believe one of the goals of eudev was stability and the old way of |
16 |
doing things which I want and get ... after removing gnome3 and |
17 |
installing LXDE where I need a desktop (and LXDE is moving from gnome2 |
18 |
to QT, even better) I am getting less and less interested in creating |
19 |
ongoing pain for myself with udev/systemd/gnome etc. |
20 |
|
21 |
There may be bugs, but on my installations its been udev thats created |
22 |
the hassles. |
23 |
|
24 |
BillK |