1 |
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
2 |
<volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> Am 19.10.2014 um 20:56 schrieb Rich Freeman: |
4 |
>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:41 PM, James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
>> As far as docs go - what specifically is unclear? Systemd is rapidly |
6 |
>> evolving so things do get out of date, but for the most part stuff |
7 |
>> like this can be found in man systemd.exec and such. Lennart's series |
8 |
>> of blog posts on system administration using systemd is a very good |
9 |
>> place to start. -- Rich |
10 |
> |
11 |
> and you are fine with that? That the package that becomes Pid1 is such |
12 |
> an unstable, ever involving mess that not even the docs are keeping up |
13 |
> with it? |
14 |
|
15 |
If I wasn't fine with it I'd hardly be running Gentoo. :) You just |
16 |
described half of the distro, though it isn't changing as rapidly as |
17 |
it used to. |
18 |
|
19 |
Most of the issues are in the init scripts, which technically aren't |
20 |
really part of systemd. It is fairly immature everywhere. If you |
21 |
want a really stable experience then you should probably stick with |
22 |
RHEL or Debian Stable. :) |
23 |
|
24 |
> |
25 |
> You just gave me another reason not to use systemd. |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
Sounds like you didn't really need one. It is a free country - you're |
29 |
no more required to run systemd than any Gentoo developer is required |
30 |
to fix openrc init scripts or systemd units... |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Rich |