| 1 |
On Monday, 9 September 2019 15:52:23 BST Jack wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> What does "eix most' show? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
$ eix -e most |
| 6 |
[I] sys-apps/most |
| 7 |
Available versions: 5.0.0a-r1{tbz2} ~5.1.0 |
| 8 |
Installed versions: 5.0.0a-r1{tbz2}[1](14:18:39 22/03/19) |
| 9 |
Homepage: https://www.jedsoft.org/most/ |
| 10 |
Description: Paging program that displays, one windowful at a |
| 11 |
time, the contents of a file |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
[1] "prh-local" /usr/local/portage |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
(What ugly sentence construction.) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Man eix says that eix-test-obsolete is a script that calls eix several times, |
| 18 |
so I'd have been surprised if its output had differed from eix's. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> It looks like portage thinks your current install of most was done from |
| 21 |
> your local repository, Either that's true, and you just deleted it |
| 22 |
> from /usr/local/portage, or else portage is confused about where it |
| 23 |
> last installed from. In either case, just "emerge -1 most" and it |
| 24 |
> should (re)install it from the main tree. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
It's never been in my local repository. Emerging it again has fixed the eix |
| 27 |
database though. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> If you never had that package in your local repo, perhaps the more |
| 30 |
> important question is why did portage think you did? |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Indeed, and that's what I can't work out. As far as I can remember, the only |
| 33 |
local ebuilds I've had are grub-legacy, on that same box, and a patched |
| 34 |
version of localepurge to make it obey the --silent option. I still have grub, |
| 35 |
but not localepurge because it's been dropped from Gentoo. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Regards, |
| 39 |
Peter. |
Archives