Archives
Archives
| From: | Wols Lists <antlists@××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: A new AMD CPU weakness? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 17 Mar 2018 16:57:47 | ||
| Message-Id: | 5AAD48FD.2010500@youngman.org.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: A new AMD CPU weakness? by Fast Turtle |
||
| 1 | On 17/03/18 13:53, Fast Turtle wrote: |
| 2 | > So ask |
| 3 | > youself, why in hell they needed more then 4M? I could see 8M being a |
| 4 | > selling point but 64M - hell the first computer I build only had 16M |
| 5 | > (that was a 386 system). |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Because buying new 8Mb chips is expensive, and 64Mb is cheaper? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Seriously, newer memory comes in larger packages and is cheaper. (How |
| 10 | much does a 4K CMOS chip cost nowadays :-) Compare the price of DDR2, |
| 11 | DDR3, and DDR4. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Cheers, |
| 14 | Wol |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: A new AMD CPU weakness? | "Taiidan@×××.com" <Taiidan@×××.com> |