| 1 |
Nuno J. Silva wrote: |
| 2 |
> My thanks, too! There's nothing like reading on some actual experience |
| 3 |
> with this. So this was once the reason to keep / separate. Not that |
| 4 |
> important anymore (but this is still no excuse to force people to keep |
| 5 |
> /usr in the same filesystem). |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Mines on a separate partition because it is on LVM instead of a regular |
| 8 |
partition. Actually, only / and /boot is on a regular partition. |
| 9 |
Everything else is on LVM. I don't have / on LVM because I don't want |
| 10 |
to use a init thingy. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I just wonder, how many people still have /usr on a separate partition. |
| 13 |
Like most things, there is no way to really know. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Dale |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
:-) :-) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives