1 |
On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:49:52 -0500 |
2 |
Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 2012-02-05 1:41 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
> > They removed the setting because it broke a good bit of systems. |
6 |
> > No one wanted to fix it, so they got rid of it. From my |
7 |
> > understanding, if you still want the setting, you can leave it |
8 |
> > there. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Yeah, I fugured out that much, but my main question was about the |
11 |
> defaults... |
12 |
> |
13 |
> What *are* the defaults? Is the example setting that is commented out |
14 |
> the default? |
15 |
> |
16 |
|
17 |
You cannot trust the commented examples in rc.conf to be the defaults. |
18 |
I reckon they are just that - typical examples. |
19 |
|
20 |
If you search through rc.conf for the word "default" you find quite a |
21 |
few cases where the text says what the default is and the example is |
22 |
something different. In other words, the default is, um, not actually |
23 |
documented anywhere. |
24 |
|
25 |
This is a bit of a fail actually as you now have to fiddle with |
26 |
settings, make them this, reboot, make them that, reboot, see what the |
27 |
difference is. Sloppy maintenance if you ask me. |
28 |
|
29 |
I'd advise you to file a bug (feature request) asking for the defaults |
30 |
to be clearly documented where someone other than the principle dev can |
31 |
find them. |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Alan McKinnnon |
35 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |