1 |
Am 01.02.2011 14:55, schrieb Gregory SACRE: |
2 |
> Hi Stephan, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Frankly, I don't think it would bring anything to you, except maybe |
6 |
> the possibility to cancel a suspension on the fly and maybe some check |
7 |
> when coming from suspension. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I'm using tuxonice only for the suspend to disk, but even there, the |
10 |
> kernel has some builtin features that would be sufficient for me (I'm |
11 |
> lazy, I don't want to try ;-)). |
12 |
> |
13 |
> tuxonice is mainly some wrapping scripts that makes the suspension |
14 |
> more feature full than the bare kernel provided but in the end, they |
15 |
> still use what the kernel provides. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> In your case, I don't think it's mandatory to use tuxonice. |
18 |
|
19 |
Thanks, Greg! |