1 |
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 23:49:48 -0500, »Q« <boxcars@×××.net> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> qfpvajdy <qfpvajdy@×××××××××.net> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> I'm interessted to buy a laptop on which I would like to install |
6 |
>> Gentoo GNU/Linux by using 100% all hardware functions of the laptop |
7 |
>> for which I have bought. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I've just installed Gentoo on a Sony VAIO VGN-FS740, and I recommend |
10 |
> against it. Almost everything in it is well-supported, but one of the |
11 |
> most important things is a PiTA. Sony uses some unusual system to |
12 |
> handle power management, and there are things the drivers available |
13 |
> with the kernel will not handle. Most notably, I could not get control |
14 |
> of LCD brightness without installing a driver which is (a) not in |
15 |
> portage and (b) AFAICT not in most distros' repositories. If someone |
16 |
> hadn't published a portage overlay for it, I would still be struggling |
17 |
> with it. From what I've read (which was a lot more than I wanted to, |
18 |
> this is the situation with most (all?) of Sony's FS models. |
19 |
|
20 |
Think that this is exactly right. |
21 |
|
22 |
However, I wouldn't limit my laptop selection to one that is 100% |
23 |
Gentooable. |
24 |
|
25 |
e.g. I went with Sony (their smallest) and would do so again, because |
26 |
small size, light weight, and high-quality display (necessary on a tiny |
27 |
box) were so important. As you indicated, it was a PITA; Lot of stuff |
28 |
still doesn't work :-( , but it's light enough (2.7 lbs) and small enought |
29 |
that I stick it in the backpack and don't resent it. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |