Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: 7v5w7go9ub0o <7v5w7go9ub0o@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Which Laptop is recommended for Gentoo GNU/Linux?
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 18:41:43
Message-Id: op.tlqwjnv4yguj3e@you.and.your.horse
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: Which Laptop is recommended for Gentoo GNU/Linux? by "»Q«"
1 On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 23:49:48 -0500, »Q« <boxcars@×××.net> wrote:
2
3 > qfpvajdy <qfpvajdy@×××××××××.net> wrote:
4 >
5 >> I'm interessted to buy a laptop on which I would like to install
6 >> Gentoo GNU/Linux by using 100% all hardware functions of the laptop
7 >> for which I have bought.
8 >
9 > I've just installed Gentoo on a Sony VAIO VGN-FS740, and I recommend
10 > against it. Almost everything in it is well-supported, but one of the
11 > most important things is a PiTA. Sony uses some unusual system to
12 > handle power management, and there are things the drivers available
13 > with the kernel will not handle. Most notably, I could not get control
14 > of LCD brightness without installing a driver which is (a) not in
15 > portage and (b) AFAICT not in most distros' repositories. If someone
16 > hadn't published a portage overlay for it, I would still be struggling
17 > with it. From what I've read (which was a lot more than I wanted to,
18 > this is the situation with most (all?) of Sony's FS models.
19
20 Think that this is exactly right.
21
22 However, I wouldn't limit my laptop selection to one that is 100%
23 Gentooable.
24
25 e.g. I went with Sony (their smallest) and would do so again, because
26 small size, light weight, and high-quality display (necessary on a tiny
27 box) were so important. As you indicated, it was a PITA; Lot of stuff
28 still doesn't work :-( , but it's light enough (2.7 lbs) and small enought
29 that I stick it in the backpack and don't resent it.
30
31 --
32 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list