Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: gentuxx <gentuxx@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Security Updates and Portage Trees
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 04:23:39
Message-Id: 432E3BAC.6080201@gmail.com
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Hi all,
5
6 I don't know if this would be considered a newbie question or not. I
7 haven't really seen it asked, and I haven't been able to find any
8 documentation that clearly states this, so I thought I would ask here.
9
10 Why is the "--oneshot" option specified in the GLSA advisories? And
11 how does that affect the different package groups (trees) in portage?
12
13 If I update firefox with the --oneshot option, I know that it won't
14 update the "world" tree, but why? Why is that the recommended
15 procedure? Does that give me any benefit? Also, why would a package
16 be available as a "--oneshot" and NOT through a normal "emerge -Dupv
17 world"?
18
19 I love how portage unifies the packaging system, and I feel like if I
20 run all of these "--oneshot" updates for security fixes, that I'll
21 have all of these "stray" programs running around on my system, that
22 won't get updated next time I emerge "world".
23
24 Can someone maybe shed a little light for me?
25
26 Thanks.
27
28 - --
29 gentux
30 echo "hfouvyAdpy/ofu" | perl -pe 's/(.)/chr(ord($1)-1)/ge'
31
32 gentux's gpg fingerprint ==> 34CE 2E97 40C7 EF6E EC40 9795 2D81 924A
33 6996 0993
34 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
35 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
36
37 iD8DBQFDLjurLYGSSmmWCZMRAqqxAJ9LjFKFggkmVgD9SkeTcIkJ1gRbxQCfYZTX
38 A3jilZ2/0hkV2JLMZoTp1VI=
39 =onDU
40 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
41
42 --
43 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Security Updates and Portage Trees Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>