Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized?
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:15:12
Message-Id: 52305096.7090002@libertytrek.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized? by Peter Humphrey
1 On 2013-09-10 10:13 AM, Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××××.org> wrote:
2 > On Tuesday 10 Sep 2013 07:18:11 Dale wrote:
3 >> Peter Humphrey wrote:
4 >>> Is it working for you, Dale? :-)
5 >> So far, so good. I been using unstable, except for the 9999 version,
6 >> for quite a while. Are you saying something is broke and it works for
7 >> me?? O_O Seriously?? This is a joke right??
8 >
9 > No joke, I assure you. As Markos pointed out, a bug has already been opened,
10 > and I fell over it with a vanilla make.conf.
11 >
12 > Unless someone knows of a work-around, I'll stick with the old version of
13 > portage until the bug-fix reaches the stable system.
14
15 Well, according to that bug, the fix is IN 2.2.1 (well, it says the fix
16 is in 2.1.13 and 2.2.0_alpha189, which means it is (should be?) in 2.2.1...
17
18 So it can't be this bug?

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized? Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××××.org>