Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo healthy?
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 14:48:27
Message-Id: 20061223144403.28704c73@krikkit.digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo healthy? by "Bo Ørsted Andresen"
1 On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:47:04 +0100, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
2
3 > > Maybe, but they do provide an extremely useful fallback, especially
4 > > for those of us running ~arch systems. Being able to roll back to an
5 > > older, working version in seconds rather than minutes or hours is a
6 > > definite benefit.
7 >
8 > And in addition to that they only require a working tar and bash (which
9 > could be run from a livecd) to roll back.
10
11 Oh yes, I've been there when a broken glibc update stopped the computer
12 booting. Untarring the old glibc package from a live CD was all I needed
13 to get working again.
14
15
16 --
17 Neil Bothwick
18
19 Top Oxymorons Number 8: Tight slacks

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo healthy? "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss03@××××××××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo healthy? "Hemmann