1 |
On 19-Apr-13 17:52, Pandu Poluan wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Well, for me, XenServer-based virtualization is very very simple. And if |
4 |
> I compile the kernel with all Xen PV (paravirtualized) 'FrontEnds', it |
5 |
> runs near-natively. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Only the xend daemon need some 'tweaking' to run properly. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Do a Google search for "gentoo xenserver" and if you find pages written |
10 |
> by me, those are my experiences running Gentoo on top of XenServer, |
11 |
> successfully. |
12 |
|
13 |
What I had in mind is administration of hypervisor itself. |
14 |
ESXi is feature-rich product, and to handle all its possibilities |
15 |
(i.e. vMotion, vShield, HA, FT, vCenter, DRS/DPM, FW, etc) one have |
16 |
to spend quite long time by studying and the learning curve is |
17 |
very steep (again, I'm comparing with VServer or OpenVZ/Virtuozzo, |
18 |
I do not know XenServer). |
19 |
|
20 |
Deploying Gentoo-guest (or "VM" / "DomU" as they call it) is |
21 |
actually very easy. And after reading your wiki-page I'd say |
22 |
it is easier on ESXi then on XenServer, because there is actually |
23 |
no difference between installing Gentoo on VM, or real hardware |
24 |
(no need for special compile options or special device-files, |
25 |
no limit on boot-loader, etc.). |
26 |
|
27 |
Jarry |
28 |
-- |
29 |
_______________________________________________________________ |
30 |
This mailbox accepts e-mails only from selected mailing-lists! |
31 |
Everything else is considered to be spam and therefore deleted. |