| 1 |
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 05:46:17 +0100 |
| 2 |
meino.cramer@×××.de wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> »Q« <boxcars@×××.net> [14-12-16 05:28]: |
| 5 |
> > On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 05:02:40 +0100 |
| 6 |
> > meino.cramer@×××.de wrote: |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > > actually the thing is: There is a plugin called "NoScript" which |
| 9 |
> > > constantly accesses secure.informaction.com, which is the author |
| 10 |
> > > of this plugin. |
| 11 |
> > > I tried a lot to block that access from inside firefox but did |
| 12 |
> > > not find a way to do so (read: _I_ did not find... ;) |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > <http://hackademix.net/2010/07/28/abe-patrols-the-routes-to-your-routers/> |
| 15 |
> > explains the connection and how to disable it in NoScript's options. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Hi Q, |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> very interesting page...thank you! |
| 22 |
> Its the stuff I like ;) |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> What is the difference between NoScript saying "the access to |
| 25 |
> secure.informaction.com is completly anonymous" and |
| 26 |
> anyone else stating this? |
| 27 |
> Since the access is encrypted I cannot check its contents. |
| 28 |
> And how is it possible to send back an answer, if my |
| 29 |
> IP-address isn't offered (that is: "completly anonymous")? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I'm sorry, I don't know. I don't use NoScript -- I just remembered |
| 32 |
reading that the NoScript author had blogged about that connection so |
| 33 |
was able to google the page. |
Archives