| 1 |
»Q« <boxcars@×××.net> [14-12-16 05:28]: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 05:02:40 +0100 |
| 3 |
> meino.cramer@×××.de wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > actually the thing is: There is a plugin called "NoScript" which |
| 6 |
> > constantly accesses secure.informaction.com, which is the author |
| 7 |
> > of this plugin. |
| 8 |
> > I tried a lot to block that access from inside firefox but did |
| 9 |
> > not find a way to do so (read: _I_ did not find... ;) |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> <http://hackademix.net/2010/07/28/abe-patrols-the-routes-to-your-routers/> |
| 12 |
> explains the connection and how to disable it in NoScript's options. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Hi Q, |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
very interesting page...thank you! |
| 19 |
Its the stuff I like ;) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
What is the difference between NoScript saying "the access to |
| 22 |
secure.informaction.com is completly anonymous" and |
| 23 |
anyone else stating this? |
| 24 |
Since the access is encrypted I cannot check its contents. |
| 25 |
And how is it possible to send back an answer, if my |
| 26 |
IP-address isn't offered (that is: "completly anonymous")? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Do you know anything about the other address and its origin: |
| 29 |
s3-1.amazonaws.com |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
? It has something to do with a cloud service of Amazon... |
| 32 |
But what could be the origin of this one ... ? |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Best regards, |
| 35 |
Meino |
Archives