| 1 |
Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
> Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Dale wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> I thought it was ccache? I did this a while back too. Is this |
| 7 |
>>> something else we can use in addition to ccache? |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> confcache caches the results of all those ./configure runs, so that, |
| 11 |
>> in theory, a check would only be done once. This would indeed speedup |
| 12 |
>> ./cnfigure runs. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> ccache caches compiled "stuff". If you recompile a package (or a similar |
| 15 |
>> package), not everything has to be compiled again. |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> Alexander Skwar |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
> So I need to add this too huh?? I'll have to check into this. I'm all |
| 20 |
> for speed. < zoom > |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Well, *need* - dunno. It's nice, but it's rather error prone, as there are |
| 23 |
too many "broken" packages out there. That's why confcache is now p.masked. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Alexander Skwar |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Zoe: "Sir, I think you have a problem with your brain being missing." |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives