1 |
Jules Colding wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 11:51 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> This seems like a continuation of the previous build problems that you |
6 |
>> have had with firefox (where we were discussing MAKEOPTS). Assuming |
7 |
>> that others cannot reproduce this (sorry, I don't have my amd64 right |
8 |
>> now), there's still something wrong with your build system somewhere. |
9 |
>> This could be a shot in the dark, but I think that you should remerge |
10 |
>> your autoconf and automake packages to see if that affects this. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Hmm... Among my USE flags is "nptlonly". Might that be a problem? |
14 |
> |
15 |
|
16 |
Well, nptlonly seems to work for a lot of people, so I don't think that |
17 |
should be a problem. I've only ever heard of it affecting old |
18 |
binary-only software. |
19 |
|
20 |
The only change I would be tempted to make to your USE flags would be to |
21 |
add multilib, which would give you the ability to build/run both 32 and |
22 |
64-bit applications. I don't see how this could fix your current |
23 |
problems...but I did notice that Bob Sanders (one of the two WFM reports |
24 |
on this thread) has this in his USE flags. Of course he also doesn't |
25 |
have nptlonly, or userlocales, so who knows... |
26 |
|
27 |
-Richard |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |