Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: package.provided?
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:39:16
Message-Id: 20170214233859.5ba76ea7@digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: package.provided? by Harry Putnam
1 On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:22:50 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
2
3 > Something else about this entry in `man portage':
4 >
5 > [...]
6 > SYNOPSIS
7 > /etc/portage/make.profile/ or /etc/make.profile/
8 > site-specific overrides go in /etc/portage/profile/
9 > deprecated
10 > [...]
11 >
12 > So is the plan to do away with package.provided or just relocate it?
13
14 You missed the blank line above deprecated. The lines below it are a list
15 of files that can go in the profile, the first of which is called
16 "deprecated"
17
18
19 --
20 Neil Bothwick
21
22 SITCOM: Single Income, Two Children, Oppressive Mortgage