1 |
Joerg Schilling schrieb: |
2 |
> Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> I'm considering buying a solid-state drive to improve I/O performance |
6 |
>> and even reduce noise. Has anyone tried this? I was considering |
7 |
>> getting the lowest capacity I can find and putting most of the system |
8 |
>> on it. There is a roundup on tomshardware.com and it sounds like some |
9 |
>> are very much better than others. SLC sounds vastly superior compared |
10 |
>> to MLC, but also much more expensive. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I yesterday send some test results.... If you use a UFS clone like ext, |
14 |
> you will not get much better speed. You should use ZFS or another COW |
15 |
> filesystem that tries to write bigger blocks in order to avoid high latencies. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I recommend Intel or OCZ. Other SSDs have been reported as slow |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I tested OCZ |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Jörg |
22 |
> |
23 |
> |
24 |
Hi |
25 |
|
26 |
this German article says that AXFS will be available up from kernel |
27 |
2.6.28. This is a new file system named for its main future: Advanced |
28 |
Execute in Place Filesystem. This means the CPU can execute stuff from |
29 |
the ssd without loading it to ram, first. As far as I understand there |
30 |
is an upside. It is a read only file system you need to create for every |
31 |
program. I am not the geek in that but I wanted to mention it. Oh and it |
32 |
does not work if you connect your ssd by ata or usb. |
33 |
|
34 |
http://www.pro-linux.de/news/2008/13093.html |
35 |
|
36 |
kh |