1 |
brullo nulla wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Daniel Pielmeier |
3 |
> <daniel.pielmeier@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> 2008/12/2 b.n. <brullonulla@×××××.com>: |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>>> May I ask why many people on MLs use to write links as footnotes instead |
8 |
>>> that inside the mail text? I suspect it is some netiquette issue, but I |
9 |
>>> can't find info on that and I find it mildly confusing. |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>> Because http://some-vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy-long-link/some-page.html |
13 |
>> looks terrible too? |
14 |
>> |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Not to me. I am accustomed to see links inside of text in webpages, so |
17 |
> there is nothing strange in what you posted. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Since it seems only an aestethic preference, I'll continue to post |
20 |
> links in-text when appropriate (tinyurl'ing long links possibly). |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Thanks, |
23 |
> m. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
This reminds me of the text/html debate. If you put links in the body |
31 |
and some guru that has the answer doesn't like links in the body, they |
32 |
may not read your post and you could be left without a answer for a |
33 |
while longer. Or worse yet, if it is some software that is rarely used, |
34 |
they may be the only one here that uses the software and has the answer. |
35 |
|
36 |
I prefer html messages myself but a lot of people here don't like them |
37 |
so I send text. Some users even have filters that sends html to |
38 |
/dev/null which means they don't ever even get seen or read. This is |
39 |
something you may want to consider when you send something. |
40 |
|
41 |
Also, I have ran into tinyurl not working or if I look up a old post, it |
42 |
may have expired or something and the link goes nowhere. So guess what, |
43 |
I don't click on tinyurl stuff much. Exceptions may be something that |
44 |
is really huge. If you are attaching a 2Mb file, may want to post a |
45 |
link to it instead. I have also been known to send it to someone off |
46 |
list on request. |
47 |
|
48 |
Thoughts to ponder. |
49 |
|
50 |
Dale |
51 |
|
52 |
:-) :-) |