Re: [gentoo-user] Daniel Robbins' come back ?

[Galevsky]

What looks strange -from an external point of view- is that there is
lots of high-skilled people here... with huge Gentoo experience. How
did these people not manage to build some plan ? With all the
engineers, team leaders, project chiefs, and so on... involved in
Gentoo project ?

It looks like you have the abilities to analyse the situation, you are
the ones who can tell "we need that to go ahead", you know how to
plan, you used to live in an open community -that implies that you
have very good notions about smart & productive attitudes in a
not-lucrative environment- and you have the skills to implement and
deploy the solutions.

I don't know Daniel Robbins's previous work so I just have the right
to shut up (and do it with respect). But when I read this thread, I
understand that this man' plans should/will/must? be validated before
by Trustees, but also by the whole committed community (devs mostly
included) because they could not accept major changes without their
agreement (risks of fork).

So -from an external point of view, again- it comes to me that the
devs and really involved people will estimate/evaluate the
proposals... and it sounds good since they are the core of current
Gentoo maintenance and development.

But what about having work plans directly from devs ? I know that you
are very busy... but I am sure that Gentoo future could benefit from
experienced people, like Alan, as an example. Is it possible to get
some public report, written by devs that have something to tell,
explaining the current main issues, what Gentoo should do starting
from now, and the plans for near future ? Maybe with several
propositions....

Because what is sure is that non-devs face difficulties to get a clear
view of Gentoo status...

Gal'
-- 
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list