1 |
On Tuesday, November 01, 2011 02:47:27 PM Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Mark Knecht wrote: |
3 |
> > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Dale<rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> >> Hi, |
5 |
> >> |
6 |
> >> For the first time in my life, I think I have a drive failing on me. |
7 |
> >> Here> |
8 |
> >> is the info: |
9 |
> > <SNIP> |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> >> What you folks think? Can I fix it somehow? I got a good shovel |
12 |
> >> handy just in case. |
13 |
> >> |
14 |
> >> Dale |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > Start doing backups before you write even 1 more email! ;;-) |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > - Mark |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Well, it was in my brothers winders rig. Winders couldn't do anything |
21 |
> but puke on the keyboard so I brought it down here and put it in my old |
22 |
> Linux rig. I mounted it ro and got the data off it FIRST THING. |
23 |
|
24 |
Good idea... |
25 |
MS Windows has a tendency not to be able to handle failing disks... |
26 |
|
27 |
> There |
28 |
> was a boatload of pictures from their camera. Anyway, the data seems to |
29 |
> be safe tho a few may have gotten messed up. I got to test that in a bit. |
30 |
|
31 |
If there were no read errors, any damaged files were caused by ms windows, not |
32 |
the disk. |
33 |
|
34 |
> Is this terminal or can something be done to correct this? I did run |
35 |
> the dd command before I ran the selftest. I don't think it matters but |
36 |
> thought it wouldn't hurt either. If it is terminal, I'll get my |
37 |
> screwdriver out and see what these drives look like on the inside. The |
38 |
> last one I looked into was a old 14" thing many years ago. Platters |
39 |
> were about the size of 33 rpm records. lol Dang I'm old. O_O |
40 |
|
41 |
If SMART is saying it will die in 24 hours it will make a nice doorstop :) |
42 |
|
43 |
I wouldn't use it for data (even throw away stuff) anymore. |
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
Joost |