1 |
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:41 AM Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Thursday, 28 February 2019 08:43:13 GMT Davyd McColl wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > Well, that's pretty-much how git works -- that local repo was still pointing |
6 |
> > to the old remote. Updating your repos.conf won't change that as the old |
7 |
> > remote is stored in config in the .git folder. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> OK. It'd be helpful if the handbook said that, or somewhere else in the docs. |
10 |
> Without that, the clear impression is that repos.conf is the place to specify |
11 |
> the remote source. |
12 |
|
13 |
If you're going to migrate it in-place you really should set it in |
14 |
both places. Otherwise you'll end up with a surprise if you remove |
15 |
/usr/portage. |
16 |
|
17 |
In general it is usually simplest to just remove /usr/portage anytime |
18 |
you change the sync settings. At least until portage gets smarter |
19 |
about it. |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Rich |