1 |
On 2012-10-09, Grant Edwards wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 2012-10-09, Nuno J. Silva <nunojsilva@×××××××.pt> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> I think you were hit by some incompatibility between additional emacs |
6 |
>> packages and the emacs version. Do you have any external elisp files? |
7 |
>> If not, did you run emacs-updater? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> The only significant external elisp I have is nxhtml (which I rarely |
10 |
> use). |
11 |
> |
12 |
>> In fact, I got some backtraces and errors until I ran emacs-updater, |
13 |
>> after that, almost every package worked correctly, except for an |
14 |
>> external one that needs to be updated due to some changes in the way |
15 |
>> font-lock is done. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> IIRC, I did get font-lock errors when I tried nxhtml. But what |
18 |
> finally drove me back to using 23 was the inability to edit plain C |
19 |
> source files using the built-in c-mode. |
20 |
> |
21 |
>> Anyway, that was probably what made me postpone the upgrade: too much |
22 |
>> work, fixing old packages by hand *and* figuring out which other |
23 |
>> settings did they change. |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> (If you end up trying emacs-updater to fix emacs 24, you will need to |
26 |
>> run it again after eselecting emacs 23, if you want to go back to |
27 |
>> emacs 23.) |
28 |
> |
29 |
> I don't remember running emacs-updater, so I probably didn't. But |
30 |
> shouldn't built-in c-mode to work without running emacs-updater? |
31 |
|
32 |
Well, I'm no Emacs expert, but I guess it should... after all, |
33 |
emacs-updater won't even touch it... |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
Nuno Silva (aka njsg) |
37 |
http://njsg.sdf-eu.org/ |