1 |
On 2012-03-29 01:20, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> I'm in favour of /bin and /lib, and I see the pros and cons of |
4 |
> /sbin and am not too bothered about how that is done. But having |
5 |
> two (or more) of each of these is an artificial mess that is a |
6 |
> solution to a problem that |
7 |
|
8 |
As I said, it's a matter of taste. |
9 |
|
10 |
> Red Hat employ devs working on many aspects of Linux, and we |
11 |
> should be grateful for this (or do you prefer the Ubuntu approach |
12 |
> of taking with little giving back?). One of the reasons Greg K-H |
13 |
> left SUSE to work for |
14 |
|
15 |
I did say that my writing was speculative? And I never claimed Greg |
16 |
K-H is/was working for Redhat. Anyway, for the record I have always |
17 |
had a great respect and admiration for both Redhat and Greg K-H (which |
18 |
I see as a very good and knowledgeable kernel hacker) but this latest |
19 |
debacle has taken it down a few notches... On the other hand I would |
20 |
prefer Ubuntus approach to someone (anyone) pushing bad designs any |
21 |
day ("speaking" hypothetically and generally without pointing out |
22 |
anyone or any company). But this is quite pointless (my whining) |
23 |
since, as someone else mentioned, "code talks...". Perhaps some day I |
24 |
can find the time to hack my own solution (which of course will be |
25 |
perfection ;-) ). |
26 |
|
27 |
:-) |
28 |
|
29 |
Best regards |
30 |
|
31 |
Peter K |